Democracy and Climate

When we make The UK Guardian with news that one of Canada’s political parties refuses to state that climate change is real, we might like to shrink with embarrassment. When the Supreme Count rules that the federal government does have oversight of climate change - part of the continuing conversation about whether provinces or national government takes the lead, we might feel better - even if the decision is not unanimous. Decisions need clarity in a democracy.

The second book I read recently was Jonathan Manthorpe’s Restoring Democracy in an Age of Populists and Pestilence. It reflects his more than 40 years of work as a journalist and is an excellent review of what has happened in a wide range of countries. He notes that Francis Fukuyama’s original optimistic view that the only things that could affect western liberal democracy would be religion and nationalism and that wouldn’t happen - except that it has. By now, both know that and Manthorpe worries about its impact on his grandchildren and their world to come. Authoritarianism is much more popular and dangerous now in the West and Brexit and Trumpism bear that out. Before dealing with them in some detail he reconstructs the last two decades in the former Russian empire and the rise of China in a face paced and entertaining read.

He’s less worried about Canada than Europe or the United States but he doesn’t let us off the hook entirely. Compared to other countries we may look calm. While the first half of the last century was influenced by our British heritage - and my own life reflects that - the last half drew us closer to America. Now we feel somewhat estranged from both. The Huawei involvement has created new problems with China. Our isolation from traditional partners may require us to seek new ones. Manthorpe is not happy about our political administrative government systems imported from Britain, especially because of the differences in our geography, where huge areas create regions with different stresses and aspirations. Federal and Provincial conflicts are a way of life - but more interesting to the politicians than ordinary citizens. Getting things settled by the courts doesn’t necessarily help.

Our media, like those of our neighbour to the south, focus on news as entertainment and opinion often swamps actual news reporting more often than we realize. The lack of local press makes this even worse. Regional grievances are rampant. We have too many governing bodies with endless subcommittees that operate as silos; only a crisis like a pandemic lays these bare. Politics has taken a focus on leaders as folk heroes or villains making politics a matter of celebrities and influencers, rather than a matter of policies. Partisanship is not as virulent in Canada as it is in the US, but it is there - and a central consensus is becoming harder to find. Our reliance on oil and gas is going to be a force to be reckoned with. We require restructuring and retraining even more since the emergency of the pandemic.

Votes and voting will matter. So will a civil service that is competent and respected by all political parties. As we move into the new pressures brought on by climate change, engagement and trust of ordinary citizens will matter even more.

Another woman to celebrate

A top environmental and climate lawyer, Dianne Saxe brings a wealth of experience and expertise to the community. with more than forty years of experience in environmental law. From 2015-2019 she was the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario until a change of government thought that the stand-alone position was unnecessary and transferred its responsibility to the office of the Auditor General. Legal organizations have presented her with many awards and regard her as one of the world’s 25 best environmental law experts.

At a Massey College environmental conference in November 2020, Saxe and a co-presented focused on the arts and its role in communicating the importance of environmental care. The arts energize and touch the heart in a way that science is not always able to do, she says. Though institutions often are slow to change, museums have taken up the cause of environmental issues. It doesn’t help that fossil fuel industries are among their largest donors. Some of us have been around long enough when the same issue happened with the tobacco companies. She interviewed a number of artists in different fields and also had young activists interview some of their elders like David Suzuki.

Her website, is rich in resources. Her podcasts where she interviews climate heroes doesn’t include herself, but she clearly is one..

Celebrating Women

Begun in 19111 and marked annually on March 8th, International Women's Day (IWD) is one of the most important days of the year to:

• celebrate women's achievements

• raise awareness about women's equality

• lobby for accelerated gender parity

• fundraise for female-focused charities

The theme this year is Choose to Challenge. It directs people to do so by looking a statements on social media, through images that show bias and stereotypes, and to foster discussions, The Canadian Women’s Foundation has been particularly active in sponsoring gender justice.

And as the pandemic’s effects continue and there is a call to return to “normal” it may also well to to rethink the less attractive aspects of normal. You can see some of them.

Musings

In spite of ignoring social media lately, I liked this image that a son recently published on his personal news feed. There were some flat earth indications on other things I have read recently.

The admirable EcoChallenge is sending me Thirty Days of Readings on Systems thinking with daily articles and videos. I intend to learn more from these and undertake a a study of a recent organizational situation that has gone badly to see whether there are lessons to be learned using this approach. But there are also connections with the flat earth thinking and other recent readings that I can make immediately.

Fareed Zacharia writing his weekly column in the Washington Post and also presents it as an introduction to his weekly show on CNN. His interviews are excellent and the introduction is worth a watch for its own sake. He asks:

“The current Republican congressional delegation includes people who insist the 2020 election was stolen, have ties to violent extremist groups, traffic in antisemitism and have propagated QAnon ideologies in the past. At the state level, it often gets worse. Mainstream Republicans have tolerated these voices and views for years. Can the party finally find a way to control them?” He goes on to say that in any political party or institution what has to be controlled is the outer fringes of the organization.

On Saturday, I read that there was a protest in Edmonton against Covid-19 health measures. It involved hundreds of people starting from Lethbridge. Global News noted:

“The protest was organized by the “Walk for Freedom Alberta” group. That group claims to stand up for rights and freedoms and “peacefully promote breaches to our civil liberties across Alberta.”

The Mayor of Edmonton protested the protesters by noting that the pandemic is not a hoax and that some behind the protest may be connected with known hate groups. Canadians can spare any self righteousness when we view our neighbours to the south.

The theme of supposed unfairness continued this morning (Feb. 22) with and article in the Globe and Mail reporting on a defiance coming from a western church congregation. While many churches with limited reopening in Ontario have noted that there was not a single case of infection, the article begins with a story about a small church in Saskatchewan. On Christmas Eve 15 people gathered for an early service with all the proper precautions in place - and no masks, no singing. But afterwards one sick person discovered that more than 12 had contracted the virus. In Edmonton, a pastor remains in jail for opening his church in contravention to restrictions. His attorney is trying to make the case that that freedom of religion is more important than public health.

Public health has also led to similar conflicts in British Columbia. The Provincial Health Officer, Bonne Henry, argues that services of worship unfortunately have elements most likely to cause the spread of the virus. These are gatherings of people from different households - over an extended period of time, held indoors in buildings often with poor ventilation and activity can include singing. The congregation is also likely to contain elderly persons with pre-existing conditions. It’s a recipe for high risk - and that’s why I avoided any such opportunities in Ontario when live services still existed. I administered a registration system for one and was startled to see who wanted to attend - primarily the highest risk group. Perhaps they just didn’t care whether death came sooner or later.

Yes - sometimes rights are infringed upon. But it’s difficult to see a small number of people championing their own rights above those of a broader community. Generally Canadians see things differently than their American cousins and I find it depressing to see individualism topping (I refuse to Trumping or former-guying) society as a whole. I can understand making comparisons with bars or restaurants in Alberta - but why not advocate for their sharing concern for the common good by closing until it is safer.

When it comes to common good, there was better inspiration in the Globe’s business section with an article on leadership where Mi’kmaw educator Marie Battiste was interviewed. She is a retired professor from the University of Saskatchewan, an honorary member of the Order of Canada with four honorary doctorates and many other citations.

Her current research asks us to think historically and aims to assess the teaching of our history sad history of the treatment of first nations peoples and how to improve the teaching of indigenous knowledge. Here are some of her insights:

• Understand your own skills and talents and how you can use them to best understand and serve your purpose.

• Indigenous ways of life embrace a more holistic worldview, anchored in the understanding that we are all interconnected.

• When we understand how we are related, we better understand our obligations and responsibilities to one another, to the earth and to the seven generations to come.

My father wrote a family history which told us of more than seven generations past - and part of that story is one of our white privilege in spite of many hardships along the way. I commend this wise indigenous leader’s reminder of our role in learning the truth in assessing our science and our society. A long view shows us the importance of the systems of which we are a part and the ones we determine.

Governance - Sage Advice

We discussed some of the basics of morality in the west in a discussion groujp yesterday. From our European perspective the scriptural documents appeared to be the guidelines for morality even when they were made more general with terms like care and compassion. But it reminded me of something that I read in Brain Pickings, where the writer sends us back to Confucius, living in the east between 551-479 BCE.

“The ancient Chinese philosopher and statesman Confucius recognized the indelible link between personal and political morality, recognized that interpersonal kindness is the foundation of social justice, recognized that democracy — a form of government only just invented on the other side of the globe in ancient Greece, not to take root in his own culture for epochs — begins in the heart.”, she says.

Confucius made a connection “between personal good and public good rooted in purity of heart and discipline of mind” – a relevant directive for current politicians.

How does one get there? It means an orderly and disciplined home environment, which means moving back to individual responsibility, developing priorities around what is important – and seeing these as organic categories, looking at these with the mind and moving back for final evaluation by the heart. With these in place, one can work back to through the steps in ascending order leading to good governance at local and regional levels - and ultimately to national and international ones that have developed long after Confucius.

What if these were the steps politicians took – as opposed to trying to stay in office as their only imperative?