News Coverage

I’ve found myself spending more time on Substack with a group of writers and media people who have self-identified as “The News Community” – several former writers for mainstream media including Paul Krugman, Jennifer Rubin, Joyce Vance, Heather Cox Richardson Jim Acosta, Rachel Maddow, Kara Swisher and Timothy Snyder. They point out the folly of the New York Times and even PBS who have to cover both sides with an “on the other hand” dual perspective. Apparently, this view is even getting to the Times itself that has asked readers what they think of their coverage in a special article today in response. I’m taking a look.

·       They are managing the “flood the zone” chaos with hiring more reporters and editors with an attempt to back up occasionally to summarize “how Mr. Trump was acting free of so many of the constraints that had kept him from pursuing his agenda and instincts during his first term.”  My own take is that they need to step up every time rather than stepping back.

·       They claim that their journalists will not be intimidated. Paul Krugman said in his last post that he felt that he was.

·       “The main lesson is to try to separate what some would call “The Trump Show” — his ability to command attention, often by making norm-breaking or outrageous statements — from the concrete policy decisions and substantive changes in the direction of the country.” What really bothers me is the number of images of the president which get as much attention as the other issues above. It is to the credit of my other morning news read, The Globe and Mail is that the have stopped showing his image above any article – lessening the inevitable omni-presence.

·       When asked about choices and scrutiny of their stories, the rightly cite many sources but zero in on the reporter who says, “I’ve found a great story.” So today the remarkable stories are of course a three-hour praise laden meeting of the cabinet and on a parallel line in the online version the announcement of an engagement. It is so typical of us all – multitasking celebrity worship and world changing issues.

·       They go a bit weak when asked about words like propaganda and lies. It is rather nuanced to claim long term “tenuous relationship with facts.” The president is being let off the hook by saying that perhaps he actually believes some things are true when actually they are not. The word to use for this might be “delusional” and questioning whether a delusional person should be in the role that he is in. There are, in fact, constitutional ways to deal with such a problem, and an additional role may be to educate members of government who appear to be avoiding its existence.

·       They rightly suggest that data from any source should be verified by a number of others.

·       They are keeping track of moves with a scorecard – an average of eleven per day. Their visual graphics are admirable. Part of the difficulty is the one hundred items a day that appear and disappear. As a news addict. I like others. Are always looking for the next big thing.

·       Sourcing the news through official press briefings is seen by readers as problematic. The response is that they are there but use other sources. They note that the previous president gave view interviews, while this one is more open to them. Fact checking is necessary of course – but what it means is they are extending the in-your-face podium of daily nonsense.

·       They do allow a range of opinions and guest editors and vet them well. These are among the most interesting reads for me.

·       Immigration information coming at them is full of false leads and starts. I don’t envy the paper in this regard. But to an observer from outside their country the amount of coverage about its effect on the economy rather than the assault on human dignity is concerning.

·       Their coverage of climate change is questioned. The answer is not one that I find totally reassuring. The response is that they are talking to scientists and academia rather than current government “experts.” Following the money isn’t mentioned.

·       And as of today with special interest for Canadians is TARIFFS. They praise a neat little three slide graphic which I find hard to understand because it goes too fast. Then they move on to tell us that car parts come from different countries. Hello? We Canadians know that has been happening for several years. Is this news to most Americans? They go on to say that they are providing lots of articles.

·       Readers would like to see less of Trunp on the home page. They would be happier in Canada where this happens less frequently. I agree with the editors that this presidency is the main story. But at least we don’t have to have shopping and recipes compete at the same level. Sometimes it is nice to live where we do, not because of more elbows up, but because of more sanity.

·       To be fair, they do seem to be talking to a variety of Americans with different points of view.

·       Readers are concerned about threats to reporters. Timothy Snyder notes that investigative reporters are the real heroes and we are mourning those who have provided the real story in Gaza at the cost of their lives. The response reminds us of the dangers to them even in the land of the free where they have to create a home for the brave.

·       Paying for news is another concern of the readers that Timothy Snyder shares in On Freedom. The Times confirms that there are costs but share as widely as they can through summaries.

·       They get called from their readers on “President” or “Mr. Their answer is a good one and applies to our own leaders as well – official at the first mention, but not necessary subsequently, as has been an historical pattern.

Confabulation

I had to look it up. I could see some roots in “con” and “fabl” looked like something made up. Google AI and Wikipedia are somewhat different. The first sounds authoritative while the second is, as usual, more nuanced. Both note an association with belief in false memories as a sign of dementia, much confidence that mistaken beliefs are true. It sounds a bit like letting someone off the hook.

A retirement home administrator once talked about current residents dividng them into the young-old and the old-old. As someone closer to her old-old all the time, I don’t like age and dementia as synonyms. But one former American president that we Canadians live next to, had difficulties that I tended to dismiss until I could see them for myself by tuning in to the last five minutes of a presidential debate. Age was not the problem.

I’m therefore concerned that so much of the press is ignoring what is right in front of them. We Canadians are coming to terms with trying to deal with such a person - who insists that we are sending enormous amounts of fentanyl to his country and must be punished. Other candidates for punishment are in the news every day – including his own supporters. It was therefore instructive to read a post this morning by Chris Truax in The Hill about a certain person’s mental decline and asking, “What Now?” as well as adding an unfamiliar word to my vocabulary.

This author believes that confabulation arrived on July 15 with the certain person’s memories of an uncle who had conversations with a serial killer. (We Canadians might put the date much earlier in terms of the fentanyl accusation, but few Americans seemed to worry about that.) The certain person goes on to talk about drug prices apparently being reduced by 1,000 percent and Truax notes that mathematical miscalculations are another symptom. Barack Obama and James Comey didn’t make up the Epstein files. Who appointed Jerome Powell? We know. It also says something about Canadians that a person like me knows all about these stories even from our own daily press. They are not a mystery

Now the US economic numbers are wrong. Blaming Canada gets a pass this yime. Instead, a certain person fires the Commissioner of Labor Statistics. He thinks the head of the Federal Reserve must go so that American can keep “doing GREAT.”

There was another article in the Australian publication, Aeon Weekly, which should give us all pause. It is entitled “How to Run the World” and written by David van Reybrouck, Philosopher Laureate for the Netherlands and Flanders. His main argument is the need for new forms of international diplomacy and is well worth reading. A couple of points struck me in relation to the news of the morning and there are some good aphorisms: “Diplomacy is distrust clad in good manners;” Worlds Fairs in the early twentieth century were “multilateralism for the millions: competitive entertainment where European countries came together to challenge each other.” Multilateralism continued with the creation of international institutions that somehow worked for a long time.

But a new threat has emerged. Climate change. The first bodies to deal with it followed the institutional model of international panels like the International Panel on Climate Change, with the COP conferences of 198 countries. The signings at these conferences, the author states, are the result of four centuries of diplomatic history. We agreed to “transition away from fossil fuels” at COP 29 in December of 2023. We forgot that science had known and warned about the dangers of fossil fuels for thirty years before this. The president of the largest country in the world thinks climate change a hoax. (Confabulation?) Another maxim from the author: “We are unprepared for the storms ahead and unwilling to redesign the vessel.” Nature, he notes, has no national boundaries. We are only beginning to wake up to that reality.

Van Reybrouck goes one to propose elements of innovative design that deserve another post. A commentator on our national television noted last night that after a recent US visit, he sees in Americans a growing understanding of why we Canadians are so upset.

We Canadians can wait for better tariff arrangements, we can buy local products, and we can enjoy vacations in our own country, but it is the responsibility of Americans to do something about a certain person. Protests are good. Holding elected representatives to account for their actions or lack of them is even better.

Sex, Lies and . . .

Traditional online news design creates views of where we are right now. The New York Times website this morning has an article about starvation in Gaza on its left hand side and an obscenely oversized giant hamburger on the right side. Does anyone else see the irony here? News and enterprise compete on nearly every page.

Then there’s the morning Globe & Mail . It’s full yet again of the story of five young hockey players and their interaction with a young woman, who took them to court for sexual assault and lost the case. On other pages. we revisit the Epstein trial and the MAGA world’s obsession with it. We move on to a certain president’s visit to Scotland where he may not receive the greatest welcome ever. It looks as though Canadians are stuck with tariffs coming soon. The Substack types feature “enshittification” all over Substack as though the term were as common as “technology”.

It's so easy to abandon all this and go to the game world of Connections, Wordle, Strands, Letterboxed and Spelling Bee - or even Tri-Mountain Solitaire and Free Cell. Piano practice is more sensible. So is getting back to painting in acrylics, no matter how amateur the result. Doing things we love, in the latter cases, is healthier.

But we can’t avoid the pain and suffering in our world and its foolishness. The additional word to be added to the title is Money.

·       The young hockey players are groomed to line the pockets of the professional leagues. They are a commodity at a very young age.

·       The young woman buys into the glamour of association that their fame and fortune creates.

·       Sex becomes a commodity for both sides here. When it all becomes public both sides lose in spite of a verdict of not-guilty.

·       Starvation is hard to imagine in a world of large hamburgers.

·       Those whose identities are tied up in conspiracy theories have a rough time, when alternative facts run amuck.

·       The Scots are big on values and honesty. We’ll no doubt read more about how that one plays out.

·       Tariffs affect all the players. We’re waiting for that movie too.

·       “Enshittification” is now the word of the year and you can watch at least three YouTube videos that explain it. But there used to be some good old words to use for many of these situations. They were pride, greed, wrath, envy, lust, gluttony, and sloth. Those still seem to cover the waterfront.  If we want to move beyond them we just might have to do more about the last one.

Choices

It is hard not to get emotionally involved with current bullying from the south. If you google bullying, It mainly responds to school-yard events. It’s tempting but not too productive to think of it that way. Even mainstream news media reports with a “Can you believe this?” without any correction.

Canadians need to stay calm, but at the same time respond to threats with firmness and name the lies. A US president proclaims that things have never been better in his country one minute and then plays victim in the next. While the constitution names some rights to impose tariffs, in several cases, this guy is just breaking the law to assert personal power.

We might do a few things:

• Say “STOP LYING”.

• Say nothing.

• Laugh at someone who is being rediculous and pathetic.

• Be unimpressed.

• Stop negotiating.

• Wait.

• Talk to friends - personal and international.

• Trust those who are trustworthy.

Other

It’s Pride Month in Canada and there will be the usual parades across the country. While I don’t normally attend them, I commend that they still happen as a reminder, even though we also have a charter of rights and freedoms. That’s why reading American Supreme Court and other legal decisions is so depressing. A side issue is the way news media always names the party in power when a judge was appointed as a rationale for the decision... I have no idea of the party affiliation of any Canadian judge, nor do I care. I still trust judges to be nonpartisan – and I still trust the system as a whole. If there have been bad decisions in the past, new knowledge and new understandings can change them for the better.

But what is common to recent decisions is the US political sphere in almost a knee jerk reaction – cynical acceptance of the decision in advance or even surprise. What is sobering is the dismissal of the “other.” It’s everyone for themselves” in a dog-eat-dog world. But it’s deeper than that. Whether believing, agnostic or atheist, the speaker often reveals his definition of the divine.

I continue to be a person who tries to practise my understanding of my faith. Karen Armstrong quotes a monk who once stated, “It doesn’t matter what you believe – but it does matter what you practice.” Maybe that idea gets it right. If you believe in a deity that punishes, you live in fear – for yourself and for those you care about. You need to do whatever it takes to feel safe. Protecting leads to becoming defensive – and the right to defend seems now to be the right to be violent against anyone who is perceived as the other.

In a recent hearing here was a response to Senator Slotkin who quoted from a memoire, “Senator, I’d be careful of what you read in books and believing it — except for the Bible,” he said. The speaker was the United States Secretary of Defense. What does he believe?

And that’s where we now - in serious trouble. Even though he and I both might call ourselves Christian, we seem to have big differences about the contents and directives of that book, Reading it in many translations, seeing splits and wars in empires based on interpretations as small as the single word, “and” in a creed –. Beliefs lead to actions.

I don’t always know what I believe. Unlike most of my family and friends, I stick it out in a faith community because I’d rather be able to attack it from the inside if I need to. But it is because of what all its community teaches me – not just the official leaders or hierarchies, though some of them are models too. Thar community saves me from that fear of the other.

When I do see that fear in action in other parts of my life, I try not to become fearful of its consequences. If life is a gift, we are neither gods nor objects. As Simone Weil said, the past and the future are our only treasures. We have the gift of insight into ways our world could be better – and we can do some small things to make that happen.

We all depend on those others – first parents, then friends and colleagues and so many others, past and present, that make our lives possible in ways we can never know. To humiliate others, to torture others, to remove others is never the answer. We are watching a regime unfold in which everyone is suddenly becoming the enemy – a different color of skin, a different political party, a different view of the law, a different gender or orientation, a different view of science. It's not just sad. We can learn from history. It’s another country on a route of self-destruction. It’s even more important to live in my own country and take steps, however small, to make it the place I want it to be – compassionate, creative, courageous – and beautiful.