My writings - and those of others.
Practical changes
Turning to practical things I should be doing to save the planet allows a short break from thinking about other things. There is a new coach in this area in the Washington Post who is now offering weekly tips.
He points out the dilemma we continually face. One person’s actions doesn’t have a significant effect. Nevertheless, united efforts do. Anything we can do to encourage friends and colleagues to join in can help. So here is my help in spreading the news - some counter-intuitive. We live in the age of wonderful appliances that do their jobs well.
Stop pre-rinsing the dishes before putting them in the dishwasher. The appliance uses less water than washing by hand and detergents are effective. Scraping is good; rinsing is unnecessary.
Turn out the lights as your parents always used to remind you to do - but recognize that this action is a minor one now with the invention of LED units. Make sure you have replaced any old ones because these new ones emit more light with only 10% of the previous electricity use. What this means is keeping up with the applications of good science from reputable sources and paying attention to it.
Pay more attention to the food on the back of the fridge shelf that may be going bad than worrying about changing the temperature. Food waste is a bigger issue.
Wash your clothes in cold water. Detergents have improved. You can also try those detergent sheets that friends of mine keep recommending. I meant to order some online but did notice them in a nearby shop so I now have no excuse to buy another of those large plastic bottles that take a lot of shelf space to transport.
Livable Cities
I’m glad to live in one. Here they are according to the Economist
Vienna, Austria
2) Copenhagen, Denmark
3) Zurich, Switzerland (tie)
3) Calgary, Canada (tie)
5) Vancouver, Canada
6) Geneva, Switzerland
7) Frankfurt, Germany
8) Toronto, Canada
9) Amsterdam, Netherlands
10) Osaka, Japan (tie)
10) Melbourne, Australia (tie)
And the other interesting part - not one American City made it . . . .
The Speed of Change
I’ve been busy with many things in my life and remiss in writing. I observed to someone recently, “Keep your day job, You will be much less busy than you will be later in retirement”. The Canadian orchestral conductor, Boris Brott, observed in an interview that he would not want to ever retire. Sadly he did not, when he died in a hit and run accident.
I don’t have paid employment, but I have lots of it in volunteer and self -imposed places. Reading and other kinds of writing do take up time. And reading gives me my best posts - not original at all, but thought provoking. Here is one from Larry Rasmussen’s Earth Honoring Faith: Religious Ethics in a New Key.
“Anyone born in 1936 and still alive in 2003 (I was for both ) was around for 97.5 percent of all the oil ever pumped and burned. In the prodigious half-century from 1950 to 2000 the global consumer economy produced, transported and consumed as many goods and services as throughout the entirety of prior history.”
What is enough is a question that has been asked before. The Limits to Growth, the Report of the Club of Rome was published in 1972. Forty years later we still avoid it. Rassmussen does not let us off the hook. He’s asking for changes based on the faiths we have inherited which asks things of us. I’ll be quoting more from him in the future.
The Time has Come
Strong words from the Secretary-General of the United Nations, António Guterres, about the latest document from the International Panel on Climate Change. “an atlas of human suffering and a damning indictment of failed climate leadership,” and he added that “the world’s biggest polluters are guilty of arson of our only home.”
Bill McKibben’s latest essay in the New Yorker contends that the time to act is NOW.
· There is a relation to the war in Ukraine. Fossil fuel has given Putin the money to finance this atrocious invasion.
· John Kerry called the Glasgow climate talks our last best hope to which Greta Thumberg responded, “blah blah blah”.
· If the US bans Russian oil – that’s just the beginning. We have to ban oil everywhere.
· Our species has learned to depend on combustion. Now we have to unlearn it. We’ve focused on the pandemic, but we didn’t note this fact. In 2020, fossil-fuel pollution killed three times as many people as covid-19 did.
· What we have forgotten is the fire that we can access from elsewhere without drilling for it – the sun.
· We have the resources to replace burning fossil fuels. Early predictions of production of wind and solar energy production were pessimistic, but that is changing. McKibben notes that Iceland, Costa Rica, Namibia, and Norway—are already producing more than ninety per cent of their electricity from clean sources.
· Cost matters. Here is another quote from McKibben. “ By 2013, the cost of a kilowatt-hour of solar energy had fallen by more than ninety-nine per cent since it was first used on the Vanguard I. Meanwhile, the price of coal has remained about the same. It was cheap to start, but it hasn’t gotten cheaper.”
· People have believed for a long time that the cost of changing from coal is prohibitive. Since that is no longer the case, it is beliefs and attitudes that have to change.
· There are huge implications for Canada, according to McKibben. “A third of Canada’s natural gas is used to heat the oil trapped in the soil sufficiently to get it to flow to the surface and separate it from the sand. Just extracting the oil would put Canada over its share of the carbon budget set in Paris, and actually burning it would heat the planet nearly half a degree Celsius and use up about a third of the total remaining budget. (And Canadians account for only about one half of one per cent of the world’s population.)”
· But we have a huge potential for renewable energy from the sky. Do we want to leave that in the air rather than thinking about what we can take from the ground?
· Much of the world is an importer of coal – and the ships that carry it there do so over and over with fuel to transport it. Wind blades have to be transported too – but one shipment of them lasts for fifty years.
· We are going to need more electricians. That’s a retraining decision that has to be made by governments. They will ultimately be well paying jobs.
· We’re still up against those who want to keep burning things – including one member of the US senate who holds the power to do so while benefiting from coal production. We pretend that natural gas is cleaner, while forgetting that it still involves burning something. Natural gas, McKibben says, is a bridge fuel to nowhere.
· Wood burning is also seen as an alternative. But wood takes years to replace and all the tree planting in the world can’t keep up.
· Carbon capture is raised as a possibility – but it costs more than solar power.
· Utilities will fight hard – charging huge rates for changing systems to discourage changes. Governments need to regulate.
· After pointing out that those who cause the least energy damage are the ones to suffer most, McKibben quotes Naomi Klein on inequities and the need for environmental organizations to think beyond themselves: “ Winning will take sweeping alliances beyond the self-identified green bubble—with trade unions, housing-rights advocates, racial-justice organizers, teachers, transit workers, nurses, artists, and more. But, to build that kind of coalition, climate action needs to hold out the promise of making daily life better for the people who are most neglected right away—not far off in the future. “
· The haves of the world have to pay more to the fifty five have-not countries to help them pay for transfers to renewable energy. So far, these have been empty promises.
· We need to learn from our indigenous cousins who know the value of using small fires to prevent larger conflagrations – something that they have known for hundreds of years.
Disasters
Over the last few weeks I was preoccupied with a convoy of trucks. Now most if the news focuses on tanks and rockets and brave people dying. It’s easy to forget the longer term damage now coming to haunt us, that doesn’t care about how we mess up with trucks and tanks. It deals with how the practices of the first world will affect the two thirds who never enjoy our privileges and now will suffer even more. We have never come to terms with the reality that the planet has a one way irreversible journey and forgetting that impacts our own future - but not fairly. Those who already have the least will suffer the most.
The latest IPCC report still offers a sliver of hope. It’s hard to predict that the first world, already so arrogant and sure of its privilege will suddenly show remorse and change. Our track record isn’t good.
The report is immense in scope - 34,000 studies produced by more than 1,000 researchers and scientists and endorsed by 195 nations. There are things we can agree upon. Here are some of the things to recognize:
Half the world’s population is short of water at some time in the year
One out of three suffers from heat stress. That will grow to 50 or 75% if we fail to act.
A billion people living in coastal areas will be exposed to flooding by 2050
Much farm land is gradually becoming incapable of sustaining crops. A million children in Africa alone could suffer from stunted growth.
Wild animal habitat reduction is causing animals to move and become extninct
We don’t protect land, fresh water and oceans. Instead of carbon capture, we are sending more into the atmosphere.
While the poor suffer most, the first world isn’t escaping. The health of the planet affects us all - physically, mentally, emotionally and spiritually. As the season of Lent begins, we need to grieve our losses, but not stop there. It’s incumbent upon all of us to act individually, corporately, nationally and internationally. The planet isn’t the stage set . The heart of stone must become a heart of flesh.