My writings - and those of others.
Taking the Heat
On this Canada Day there are two images of life here:
People in Litton, British Columbia, trying to cope with the highest temperature ever recorded in the country and one the hottest places in the world - 49.6 degrees Centigrade and 121 degrees Fahrenheit. Why is this happening in a mountainous region where on a previous visit, I saw snow in the middle of summer on the heights of some of the nearby mountains?
Because - as Scientist Eric Holthaus writes in The Guardian,
“Climate change is not just warming the surface of the planet, it’s warming Earth’s entire troposphere – the lowest layer of the atmosphere where all our weather occurs. That’s particularly true in mountainous areas, where temperatures are rising even faster than elsewhere. When snow and ice recedes or even disappears from mountains, the bare soil beneath can warm unimpeded. A 2015 study found that mountainous areas above 2,000 meters (6,500ft) are warming about 75% faster than places at lower elevations.”
And the other image:
Churches are burning. It’s no accident that they are Roman Catholic Churches near First Nations Reserves. Another story this morning reveals even more unmarked graves of residential schools. The searches are only beginning and the lack of response of one of the perpetrator churches is mounting. It is an answer but not the best one. Mourning will not give way to dancing while The Indian Act is still in place. It prohibited not only dancing but any recognition that the sacred practice of anyone outside the settlers’ cultures was suspect. The result was cultural genocide.
I spent yesterday reading “21 Things you Didn’t know about the Indian Act”. You can watch this video (you can move ahead from the introduction a bit),
This one from TVO is also good - and shorter.
A shameful history
All countries like to celebrate their achievements. So do people on social media these days, who seem to assume that their meals, children’s graduations, hair styles and the like merit interest and praise from the rest of us. I am surprised that some people I know do this so often. We’re much less apt to cite our failures - as individuals or as nations. That would reveal how vulnerable we really are behind these facades of achievement.
But is time to come to terms with reality. As Canadians we thought that people who had been here fourteen thousand years earlier needed to be taught how to live, how to dress, what language to speak and how to worship their creator. We took young children from their parents and placed them in residential schools where we abused them physically and sexually, transmitted our diseases. starved them and buried them in unmarked graves. We left a legacy to the generations that followed them. many who are still among us.
In answer to all the “Buts” and “What Abouts” of Canadian history, the best response is to pause and look at the current realities - as both individuals and institutions where we have connections. What have we to learn from a suffering people? What do they have to teach us now?
The recommendation of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission are here. It’s time for temperature taking and further action. Suffering takes time to heal. But denying the changes that need to happen doesn’t even allow healing to start. Not all actions are our personal responsibility - but both as individuals and institutions, some clearly are.
Questions and answers
Here are the definitive questions and answers to the questions on climate change. It’s worth checking out the ones at the top and then go to the individual responses below. You may know some of the answers already but others may be new. Have a look.
The answers are extensive and also have links to further articles. It would ne good to set some time over the next few weeks to tackle one of the questions and responses at a time. An educated public is necessary. Misinformation is usually tied to an agenda. Sober realism is the necessary antidote.
Working together
This past week was the 10th anniversary of the release of the film, Journey of the Universe. More on that later. The universe consists of a good deal more than the G7 countries - soon to meet later this year. Nevertheless Canada’s academic researchers have recently joined others to encourage the countries of the G7 to work together on key issues. We live on a planet that includes many more countries, but these have some common ground.
The researchers have stressed the need for working together on both health and environmental issues. The latter includes three priorities - climate change, biodiversity and better sharing of health data in emergencies like the current pandemic. Usually such information is provided before meetings, but the recent ones strongly stress the need for collective action. No country can work alone.
Climate change and loss of biodiversity have clear connections. When weather affects the food chain, a global reaction follows and affects health everywhere. The recommendations include better sharing of data and principles of common responses. Reversing biodiversity loss is key. We have to value nature, not exploit it. The effects of doing so affect the health and safety of the most disadvantaged both within and beyond our shores. Proposals need to be concrete.
Talking about net zero emissions from coal, oil and natural gas is not the same thing as implementing the necessary changes. We have learned that putting the economy ahead of global health has consequences that affect us all. But it is not just governments that have to take action on their own. Politicians are elected to lead - but they have to follow the wishes of an informed public committed to the changes that create a better world for all.
Armchair Quarterbacking
The morning news pundits and reporters raise several issues that they are complaining about today, leading me to wonder how they would actually manage them better. I doubt that I could and suspect that they wouldn’t do any better. But I can sometimes reframe the questions. What are the ones they raise for me?
Is the CEO of one of the country’s large bank the person in the best position to tell the government not to give too much money to the poor and needy? Does he know what having no income at all feels like?
Does rioting in Northern Ireland solve its problems relating to Brexit?
Who should be vaccinated first?
Since distribution policies are causing vaccine surpluses in some communities, while others who need them have no access, are there better ways to fulfil distribution?
Is anyone looking at ordinary Americans need guns at all, rather than chipping away at ways to reduce their use?
Why are provinces in Canada denying sick pay and sending people to the federal government - when the federal government program doesn’t cover the income lost through sickness, doesn’t allow application until after the pay is lost, and has a difficult enrollment process to obtain it?
Why, when parts of the world despair of having enough vaccines, does a Canadian company that wants to produce them, have such a difficult time to get government support to do so?
Why did a prime minister let his family support a charity so obviously involved with celebrity star power?
Why were big box stores allowed to sell anything but essential items in the first place during the entire pandemic?
If we want to reduce carbon emissions from cars, why aren’t we looking at how other countries have produced such cars at lower cost?
Why haven’t public health communications looked more closely at human behaviour patterns?
Why do corporations get away with paying low taxes or no taxes?
I haven’t easy answers to any of these. And therein lies a tale. Most of us spend little or no time on thinking about any of these. That means that we let others muddle through when the possibility of better answers depends on the engagement and determination of all of us to create better answers. These are opportunities missed.